beppenyc
05-26 01:17 PM
I don`t remember where i read it but they will pick the first 7 republican of the SCJ and the first five dem of the SJC, the bad news is the Session , according to the article will be part of the conference.
Corny and Kyle will be part of the conference too (that for sure).
Corny and Kyle will be part of the conference too (that for sure).
wallpaper Sad anime girl
sid
04-02 02:40 PM
Watzgc,
Did your employer get a new LCA for the CA project when you changed projects? ... just one more thing to check before you send in the RFE response with new contract.
Did your employer get a new LCA for the CA project when you changed projects? ... just one more thing to check before you send in the RFE response with new contract.
cupidking
06-10 11:42 AM
Hello ppl, :)
I'm from the western suburb of Chicago..l'm new to this forum and would like to sign-up / subscribe for the IL Immigration forum.. Please let me know the process involved..
Thank you
I'm from the western suburb of Chicago..l'm new to this forum and would like to sign-up / subscribe for the IL Immigration forum.. Please let me know the process involved..
Thank you
2011 The demons r taking t humans
sjhugoose
February 4th, 2004, 08:31 PM
Nikon put itself "On The Ropes", by not paying attention to what the market wants. Canon have consistently caught them with their pants down with the D60, 300D and the mkII. Very kind of Canon to leave Nikon anywhere near 30% of the table scraps. who says the blokes at Canon don't have a heart?
I think they may make a strong fight back with the D70, that looks like a lot of camera for a great price.
I think they may make a strong fight back with the D70, that looks like a lot of camera for a great price.
more...
waitnwatch
05-27 10:45 AM
Since I am older and wiser now, I can easily take them.
Yes, I must correct myself. It is not 525 (even though that is what the ever hurrying radio talk show hosts said).
That's even better. Percentage wise it is now 300/435. How about that?
I was away this morning for a big community project that I am involved in. I wanted to round that off with a morning brunch with the Congressman I quoted, but couldn't pull it off. I had met Mr. Mark Udall a couple of times in Friendship and Business Chamber get together in Denver, CO. He is a fine gentleman.
I prey his words come true at the earliest. Got to go. Have to mow the lawn, as per home minister/ interior secretary.
Bye. Ciao.
I have a quick question about Udall. He is the Boulder and Longmont representative and a Democrat. This gentleman though voted against S1932 (hope I got the December bill right) when it went to the house. Do correct me if I am wrong. That was an appropriations bill so his view on immigration may not directly be represented by his vote. Would you by any chance know where Udall himself stands on the whole issue.
Yes, I must correct myself. It is not 525 (even though that is what the ever hurrying radio talk show hosts said).
That's even better. Percentage wise it is now 300/435. How about that?
I was away this morning for a big community project that I am involved in. I wanted to round that off with a morning brunch with the Congressman I quoted, but couldn't pull it off. I had met Mr. Mark Udall a couple of times in Friendship and Business Chamber get together in Denver, CO. He is a fine gentleman.
I prey his words come true at the earliest. Got to go. Have to mow the lawn, as per home minister/ interior secretary.
Bye. Ciao.
I have a quick question about Udall. He is the Boulder and Longmont representative and a Democrat. This gentleman though voted against S1932 (hope I got the December bill right) when it went to the house. Do correct me if I am wrong. That was an appropriations bill so his view on immigration may not directly be represented by his vote. Would you by any chance know where Udall himself stands on the whole issue.
GCVivek
03-29 04:52 PM
No, I did not misunderstand. That reply had no quote included and therefore was directed to the person who opened the thread (see very first post from AkhiChopra) and that has everything to do with salary. :o
I think you misunderstood. The OP is talking about his friend, his company and payment from clients. It has nothing to do with salary
I think you misunderstood. The OP is talking about his friend, his company and payment from clients. It has nothing to do with salary
more...
sanju
03-16 02:26 PM
For most Desis, immigration attorney is GOD. And the words coming out of the mouth of Immigration Attorney is the ULTIMATE TRUTH. We as desi community is happy to hero worship someone who kicks us everyday by conspiring to delay our green card application, not pick-up/return our phone calls/emails. That's how we as desis love, to be treated as trash. That's why we worship immigration lawyers as GODs.
In my opinion most immigration lawyers are part of Employer-Lawyer nexus to exploit employees. Most lawyers are in the business of finding loop holes to make more money for the employer (NOT EMPLOYEE).
"In my many years I have come to a conclusion that one useless man is a shame, two is a law firm, and three or more is a congress." - John Adams, 1776
.
In my opinion most immigration lawyers are part of Employer-Lawyer nexus to exploit employees. Most lawyers are in the business of finding loop holes to make more money for the employer (NOT EMPLOYEE).
"In my many years I have come to a conclusion that one useless man is a shame, two is a law firm, and three or more is a congress." - John Adams, 1776
.
2010 sad anime girl Image
loudobbs
08-23 05:38 PM
I havent got the physical card yet though...
Status online says card production requested....
Labor Approval Date: 8/13/2007
I-140 Approved sept 2005 Attorney incorrectly applied EB3
Applied second I-140 EB2 May 2007 EB2
I-485 applied June 29th
I-485 receipt notice received Aug 15
EAD approved Aug 17
YOU APPLIED ON JUNE 29TH AND GOT EAD ON AUGUST 17?. WOW!:eek:
SO WHO FILED IN JULY, CAN WE EXPECT EAD IN SEPT?.
Status online says card production requested....
Labor Approval Date: 8/13/2007
I-140 Approved sept 2005 Attorney incorrectly applied EB3
Applied second I-140 EB2 May 2007 EB2
I-485 applied June 29th
I-485 receipt notice received Aug 15
EAD approved Aug 17
YOU APPLIED ON JUNE 29TH AND GOT EAD ON AUGUST 17?. WOW!:eek:
SO WHO FILED IN JULY, CAN WE EXPECT EAD IN SEPT?.
more...
amitga
02-07 06:05 PM
In UK today Tony Blair acknowledged the immigration issue that Indian are facing. In UK Indians were able to escalate the issue to the highest level in 2-3 months. We have been trying to escalate it past 12-15 months, but still not yest acknowledged by anyone. We need to analyze that how they were able to excalte it, but we are not able to do anything.
Tony Blair Acknowledgement (http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Blair_admits_plight_of_migrant_Indians/articleshow/1577878.cms)
Tony Blair Acknowledgement (http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Blair_admits_plight_of_migrant_Indians/articleshow/1577878.cms)
hair Sad Anime Girls
Pegasus503
02-11 02:37 PM
Friends: Don't predict the bulletin. I have seen how the thread pops up every time before the bulletin is out-- and I am sure that the DOS folks read our predictions here; get mad at us; and the bulletin never progresses. EB2 India will continue to be unavailable...
I live for the predictions....
I can't make it through an hour without thinking about my application.
with a Nov 02 PD date, today marks day number 1,904.
keep on predicting.....
I live for the predictions....
I can't make it through an hour without thinking about my application.
with a Nov 02 PD date, today marks day number 1,904.
keep on predicting.....
more...
yestogc
07-17 02:57 PM
Seriously, site is down , I have not seen that too many times.............. is there someone on leave there ?
hot sad anime 7
sudhakar_p_v
06-05 02:15 PM
Hi IAMIN
have you seen any updates to your case?
have you seen any updates to your case?
more...
house Sad anime girl in Photo#39;s by
jamesbond007
09-11 01:00 PM
Since there was talk of the HR 5882 being taken up in two months time in a lame duck session, I thought it might be helpful to have this on this page.
Source = http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/uscongress/a/lameduck.htm
Lame Duck Sessions of the U.S. Congress
Once rare, now commonplace
By Robert Longley, About.com
Lame duck sessions of the U.S. Congress happen in even numbered years when Congress has to reconvene following the November general election to take care of unfinished legislation. Some lawmakers who return for this session lost their bids for reelection and will not be in the next Congress. Hence, they are informally called "lame duck" members participating in a "lame duck" session.
The possibility of lame duck sessions of Congress began in 1935, when the 20th Amendment1 to the U.S. Constitution2 took effect. Under this amendment, ratified in 1933, regular sessions of Congress begin on January 3 of each year, unless Congress passes a law in the previous session changing the date. Also, the terms of members begin and end on January 3 of odd-numbered years. Under these arrangements, any meeting of Congress between election day in an even-numbered year and the following January 3 is considered a lame duck session.
Why lame duck sessions are bad
Lame duck sessions are never desirable. Defeated lame duck lawmakers, knowing they will not have jobs in the new Congress, either tend to "just go through the motions" while debating and voting on remaining important legislation or, in worse cases, attempt to hinder or even damage the lawmaking process. On the state level, the legislatures of only 11 states even allow lame duck sessions.
By far the most dismal scenario for a lame duck session is whenever one of the two major political parties has taken away majority control of one or both houses of Congress from the other party, as happened after the 2006 mid-term election, when the Democrats won control of both the House and Senate from the Republicans. In these instances, with political tempers already running hot, the temptation for lame duck members to vent their frustrations by working to stall good bills, while turning bad bills into worse laws, becomes even greater.
Why lame duck sessions happen
Once rare, lame duck sessions have become all too common. The final days of the 109th Congress in November and December of 2006 became the 16th lame duck session since 1940.
The typical "target" date for the annual adjournment of each session of Congress is during the first week in October. The target adjournment date has become a total myth in recent years. The first session of the 109th Congress, for example, did not achieve final adjournment until Dec. 22, 2005.
During far too many recent years, the main reason for lame duck sessions has been Congress' failure to complete its work on the spending, or "appropriations" bills that form the basis of the annual federal budget. By law, the federal budget process3, including passage of the spending bills, begins the first Monday in February of each year and should be concluded by October 1st, the start of the federal government's Federal Fiscal Year. Failing to pass the spending bill by October 1, Congress is compelled to pass "continuing resolutions4," legislation that allows the government operate temporarily without an approved budget at the previous year's spending levels.
Lame duck sessions: some bad, some not so bad
Some sessions are not particularly productive, often because of political disputes and the difficulties of reaching legislative decisions in a post-election environment. In 1982 and 2002, for example, Congress returned after the November election in part to complete work on most of the spending bills. In each case, it failed to do so and the new Congress had to enact large continuing resolutions to fund government operations for the fiscal year already in progress.
Other lame duck sessions, such as the one held in 1980, have been more productive. On that occasion, Congress approved budget resolution and reconciliation measures, five regular appropriations bills and a continuing resolution, an Alaska lands bill, a landmark environmental cleanup "superfund" bill, a measure extending revenue sharing, a revision of military pay and other benefits, and a bill changing the appointment power of the Senate President pro tempore.
This About.com page has been optimized for print. To view this page in its original form, please visit: http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/uscongress/a/lameduck.htm
�2008 About.com, Inc., a part of The New York Times Company. All rights reserve
Source = http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/uscongress/a/lameduck.htm
Lame Duck Sessions of the U.S. Congress
Once rare, now commonplace
By Robert Longley, About.com
Lame duck sessions of the U.S. Congress happen in even numbered years when Congress has to reconvene following the November general election to take care of unfinished legislation. Some lawmakers who return for this session lost their bids for reelection and will not be in the next Congress. Hence, they are informally called "lame duck" members participating in a "lame duck" session.
The possibility of lame duck sessions of Congress began in 1935, when the 20th Amendment1 to the U.S. Constitution2 took effect. Under this amendment, ratified in 1933, regular sessions of Congress begin on January 3 of each year, unless Congress passes a law in the previous session changing the date. Also, the terms of members begin and end on January 3 of odd-numbered years. Under these arrangements, any meeting of Congress between election day in an even-numbered year and the following January 3 is considered a lame duck session.
Why lame duck sessions are bad
Lame duck sessions are never desirable. Defeated lame duck lawmakers, knowing they will not have jobs in the new Congress, either tend to "just go through the motions" while debating and voting on remaining important legislation or, in worse cases, attempt to hinder or even damage the lawmaking process. On the state level, the legislatures of only 11 states even allow lame duck sessions.
By far the most dismal scenario for a lame duck session is whenever one of the two major political parties has taken away majority control of one or both houses of Congress from the other party, as happened after the 2006 mid-term election, when the Democrats won control of both the House and Senate from the Republicans. In these instances, with political tempers already running hot, the temptation for lame duck members to vent their frustrations by working to stall good bills, while turning bad bills into worse laws, becomes even greater.
Why lame duck sessions happen
Once rare, lame duck sessions have become all too common. The final days of the 109th Congress in November and December of 2006 became the 16th lame duck session since 1940.
The typical "target" date for the annual adjournment of each session of Congress is during the first week in October. The target adjournment date has become a total myth in recent years. The first session of the 109th Congress, for example, did not achieve final adjournment until Dec. 22, 2005.
During far too many recent years, the main reason for lame duck sessions has been Congress' failure to complete its work on the spending, or "appropriations" bills that form the basis of the annual federal budget. By law, the federal budget process3, including passage of the spending bills, begins the first Monday in February of each year and should be concluded by October 1st, the start of the federal government's Federal Fiscal Year. Failing to pass the spending bill by October 1, Congress is compelled to pass "continuing resolutions4," legislation that allows the government operate temporarily without an approved budget at the previous year's spending levels.
Lame duck sessions: some bad, some not so bad
Some sessions are not particularly productive, often because of political disputes and the difficulties of reaching legislative decisions in a post-election environment. In 1982 and 2002, for example, Congress returned after the November election in part to complete work on most of the spending bills. In each case, it failed to do so and the new Congress had to enact large continuing resolutions to fund government operations for the fiscal year already in progress.
Other lame duck sessions, such as the one held in 1980, have been more productive. On that occasion, Congress approved budget resolution and reconciliation measures, five regular appropriations bills and a continuing resolution, an Alaska lands bill, a landmark environmental cleanup "superfund" bill, a measure extending revenue sharing, a revision of military pay and other benefits, and a bill changing the appointment power of the Senate President pro tempore.
This About.com page has been optimized for print. To view this page in its original form, please visit: http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/uscongress/a/lameduck.htm
�2008 About.com, Inc., a part of The New York Times Company. All rights reserve
tattoo Sad Anime Girl by
Soul
01-03 08:34 AM
Yay! :beam: Thanks everybody for your votes! :P
Sorry Lost, I liked yours =)
Anyway, whos gonna start the next pixel battle? With more people this time so maybe a longer deadline. Can I start it? I got a good challenging theme ;)
- Soul :goatee:
Sorry Lost, I liked yours =)
Anyway, whos gonna start the next pixel battle? With more people this time so maybe a longer deadline. Can I start it? I got a good challenging theme ;)
- Soul :goatee:
more...
pictures Sad anime girl by ~Kisa903 on
krishnam70
02-15 03:19 PM
Mr S Hammer
This is not a flaming forum. There is no need to take an advise given to a person personally and then call other people names and take a high pedestal. If you are in a position to take an advise take it or leave it.
Now to your observations and my responses.
1. I am a full time employee too with a fortune 500 company working for the past 6 years with the same company since I got laid off first after working for another American company for 3 years. So there goes your argument for working with a desi company.
2. Never been on bench due to the above reason
3. you probably were in your high school or early college when I started my programming career back in 93 and now work as an Enterprise architect. So just chill out and don't try to categorize people based on your limited understanding. Don't even attempt to talk about my skills and what I know and don't.
4. You just equated one simple post of helping a fellow person by advising him to be here for some more time to get a job to 'faking my entire career and labeled me as a fake'. Shows how mature you are
5. Its good that not a single line in your resume if fake.. then you should not be offended at all by my statement.
6. Oh BTW.. I do happen to have 2 Master Degrees from US of A and more than amply qualified to apply in EB2 category but due to the HR policies of the company could only apply in EB3.
Now cool down and take your frustration elsewhere..your time will come..
cheers
kris
What makes you think that everybody fakes theirs resumes? You are talking like its just a matter of fact that faking resume is the only way people get jobs (and what is this project business????). I now know that YOU got your job by faking your skills. And shame on you for doing that!
You conveniently missed out the 4th reason in your list
The employers filed for H-1Bs kowing very well they did not have a job to give to the candidate. The immigrants would come to the US, get "trained" to lie their way into a job, pratice more lying, fake reumes (like you have), then get into a project, get fired in 1 month or 2, go on bench, unpaind, find another project by practising more lying, and so on.
My friend, I take my statement back when I included you in the genuine candidate group. You are no better than the OP. You fakers deserve to end up in prison!
To answer your original question: not a single line on my resume is fake. And I'm not working on "projects". I have a full-time job and I'm with the same employer for the past 4 years!!!!!!!!!
Get out of your desi consultancy world for a change and see how the world outside of your little fakers club works. Not everybody is lying their way into "projects".
This is not a flaming forum. There is no need to take an advise given to a person personally and then call other people names and take a high pedestal. If you are in a position to take an advise take it or leave it.
Now to your observations and my responses.
1. I am a full time employee too with a fortune 500 company working for the past 6 years with the same company since I got laid off first after working for another American company for 3 years. So there goes your argument for working with a desi company.
2. Never been on bench due to the above reason
3. you probably were in your high school or early college when I started my programming career back in 93 and now work as an Enterprise architect. So just chill out and don't try to categorize people based on your limited understanding. Don't even attempt to talk about my skills and what I know and don't.
4. You just equated one simple post of helping a fellow person by advising him to be here for some more time to get a job to 'faking my entire career and labeled me as a fake'. Shows how mature you are
5. Its good that not a single line in your resume if fake.. then you should not be offended at all by my statement.
6. Oh BTW.. I do happen to have 2 Master Degrees from US of A and more than amply qualified to apply in EB2 category but due to the HR policies of the company could only apply in EB3.
Now cool down and take your frustration elsewhere..your time will come..
cheers
kris
What makes you think that everybody fakes theirs resumes? You are talking like its just a matter of fact that faking resume is the only way people get jobs (and what is this project business????). I now know that YOU got your job by faking your skills. And shame on you for doing that!
You conveniently missed out the 4th reason in your list
The employers filed for H-1Bs kowing very well they did not have a job to give to the candidate. The immigrants would come to the US, get "trained" to lie their way into a job, pratice more lying, fake reumes (like you have), then get into a project, get fired in 1 month or 2, go on bench, unpaind, find another project by practising more lying, and so on.
My friend, I take my statement back when I included you in the genuine candidate group. You are no better than the OP. You fakers deserve to end up in prison!
To answer your original question: not a single line on my resume is fake. And I'm not working on "projects". I have a full-time job and I'm with the same employer for the past 4 years!!!!!!!!!
Get out of your desi consultancy world for a change and see how the world outside of your little fakers club works. Not everybody is lying their way into "projects".
dresses sad anime girl.
techbuyer77
09-17 02:21 PM
How were you able to file in june 2007 when the dates were not current for eb3. They wont even accept the applications.
My pd was current on June Bulletin
January 27 2004 ROW
My pd was current on June Bulletin
January 27 2004 ROW
more...
makeup My Gravatar Meaning
zCool
04-02 11:16 AM
all of them and then some..!
Luckily I work for a genuine american company..
In org chart there was just 1 non-white sounding name.. mine:)
Luckily I work for a genuine american company..
In org chart there was just 1 non-white sounding name.. mine:)
girlfriend Sad Goth Anime Girl
vet282000
04-20 10:55 PM
Hey folks,
The proposed bill to give green card to PhDS does not include all the PhDs. PhDs listed as STEM(Science engineering technology majors) are only eligible through this bill in current form. Graduates from pharmacy, medicine, veterinary medicine, animal science are not listed as STEM. I am sure there are many more majors not listed as STEM. I think we should write a letter to congressmen about this anomaly. And I encourage non STEM PhDs to represent their concern so that we can unite and represent our concerns to the congress men. immigrtion service department has listed the subject codes fall under STEM.
You have to browse through the following link to see code for your major. http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2002/cip2000/ciplist.asp.
once you know the code for your major you can go to http://www.ice.gov/sevis/stemlist.htm to check weather your program is listed there as STEM.
good luck
The proposed bill to give green card to PhDS does not include all the PhDs. PhDs listed as STEM(Science engineering technology majors) are only eligible through this bill in current form. Graduates from pharmacy, medicine, veterinary medicine, animal science are not listed as STEM. I am sure there are many more majors not listed as STEM. I think we should write a letter to congressmen about this anomaly. And I encourage non STEM PhDs to represent their concern so that we can unite and represent our concerns to the congress men. immigrtion service department has listed the subject codes fall under STEM.
You have to browse through the following link to see code for your major. http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2002/cip2000/ciplist.asp.
once you know the code for your major you can go to http://www.ice.gov/sevis/stemlist.htm to check weather your program is listed there as STEM.
good luck
hairstyles Sad Girl Receiving a Bill
vbkris77
08-20 03:30 PM
Just for my understanding, why are we not talking about excluding dependents from EB count? If each primary applicant consumes nearly 2.5 visa, then excluding dependents will definitely be useful.
We don't talk about this because it is not feasible to achieve? Or does it slips out of our mind?
NB: I am not sure about the number 2.5; I remember this number from another thread.
I know it is part of IV agenda!!! But its all like wishlist.
We don't talk about this because it is not feasible to achieve? Or does it slips out of our mind?
NB: I am not sure about the number 2.5; I remember this number from another thread.
I know it is part of IV agenda!!! But its all like wishlist.
retropain
08-31 10:27 AM
100% of the calls to today's program were from anti-H1B people. Not 1 call supported the H1Bs. If corporates are supporting more GCs for us, and since the fate of H1B/Employment GCs is linked, we ought to support H1B legislation.
How can we get an advance notification of this recordings?? Seems the anti-immigrant forces have the inside tack
here...
Also, the C-SPAN commentator on H1B/immigration issues is frequntly Dena Bunis of the Orange County register. She said the corporate lobbies "have convinced congressman" there is a shortage...implying that there wasn't one. She needs to be contacted . Here contact info (202) 628-6381 or dbunis@ocregister.com
How can we get an advance notification of this recordings?? Seems the anti-immigrant forces have the inside tack
here...
Also, the C-SPAN commentator on H1B/immigration issues is frequntly Dena Bunis of the Orange County register. She said the corporate lobbies "have convinced congressman" there is a shortage...implying that there wasn't one. She needs to be contacted . Here contact info (202) 628-6381 or dbunis@ocregister.com
techbuyer77
09-17 03:17 PM
I have appointment tonite. Will fill you guys up tomorrow.
0 comments:
Post a Comment