newtoearth
07-12 03:02 PM
My feeling is if it is not coming out till Jul 14th evening
Dates would be some where END of 2006
Dates would be some where END of 2006
wallpaper letting go of the past.
waitnwatch
05-27 10:45 AM
Since I am older and wiser now, I can easily take them.
Yes, I must correct myself. It is not 525 (even though that is what the ever hurrying radio talk show hosts said).
That's even better. Percentage wise it is now 300/435. How about that?
I was away this morning for a big community project that I am involved in. I wanted to round that off with a morning brunch with the Congressman I quoted, but couldn't pull it off. I had met Mr. Mark Udall a couple of times in Friendship and Business Chamber get together in Denver, CO. He is a fine gentleman.
I prey his words come true at the earliest. Got to go. Have to mow the lawn, as per home minister/ interior secretary.
Bye. Ciao.
I have a quick question about Udall. He is the Boulder and Longmont representative and a Democrat. This gentleman though voted against S1932 (hope I got the December bill right) when it went to the house. Do correct me if I am wrong. That was an appropriations bill so his view on immigration may not directly be represented by his vote. Would you by any chance know where Udall himself stands on the whole issue.
Yes, I must correct myself. It is not 525 (even though that is what the ever hurrying radio talk show hosts said).
That's even better. Percentage wise it is now 300/435. How about that?
I was away this morning for a big community project that I am involved in. I wanted to round that off with a morning brunch with the Congressman I quoted, but couldn't pull it off. I had met Mr. Mark Udall a couple of times in Friendship and Business Chamber get together in Denver, CO. He is a fine gentleman.
I prey his words come true at the earliest. Got to go. Have to mow the lawn, as per home minister/ interior secretary.
Bye. Ciao.
I have a quick question about Udall. He is the Boulder and Longmont representative and a Democrat. This gentleman though voted against S1932 (hope I got the December bill right) when it went to the house. Do correct me if I am wrong. That was an appropriations bill so his view on immigration may not directly be represented by his vote. Would you by any chance know where Udall himself stands on the whole issue.
miapplicant
11-13 01:43 PM
^^^^^bump^^^^
2011 that letting go of the past is
chanduv23
11-12 02:43 PM
Chandu, here I found the LINK (http://www.murthy.com/news/n_porret.html)
"When explaining the risk of potentially stricter AC21 regulations to I-485 applicants, we are frequently asked, "If I change jobs under AC21 and the regulations are released after that, they won't apply to me, right?" Unfortunately, this is not correct. While it is not possible to predict the content or effective date of any future regulations, they will likely apply at the time of adjudicating the I-485 application, and not just when the job change occurs. In a hypothetical example, if new regulations were to limit the percentage of acceptable salary difference, or prevent multiple portings, the officer adjudicating the I-485 could decide that the job change violates the regulations, even if the change occurred months or years before the new regulations were issued."
This is not new, it has been there for a while and almost everyone who googled AC21 would have read Murthy's page.
Whatever Murthy has mentioned is her opinion. Aytes memo has not been more stricter than Yates memo but has been more clear.
So lets continue to send letters
"When explaining the risk of potentially stricter AC21 regulations to I-485 applicants, we are frequently asked, "If I change jobs under AC21 and the regulations are released after that, they won't apply to me, right?" Unfortunately, this is not correct. While it is not possible to predict the content or effective date of any future regulations, they will likely apply at the time of adjudicating the I-485 application, and not just when the job change occurs. In a hypothetical example, if new regulations were to limit the percentage of acceptable salary difference, or prevent multiple portings, the officer adjudicating the I-485 could decide that the job change violates the regulations, even if the change occurred months or years before the new regulations were issued."
This is not new, it has been there for a while and almost everyone who googled AC21 would have read Murthy's page.
Whatever Murthy has mentioned is her opinion. Aytes memo has not been more stricter than Yates memo but has been more clear.
So lets continue to send letters
more...
Macaca
01-23 09:28 PM
The following is an exactly parallel strategy for us. I just copied the lines.
1. Obtain a Schedule A retrogression amendment (anywhere from 15,000 - 90,000 visas) in the Spring.
2. Push for a permanent Schedule A retrogression amendment (Brownback amendment) whenever Congress considers Comprehensive Immigration Reform.
The concerns are
1. How to chose the numbers 15,000 - 90,000? We may need much larger numbers.
2. How the 15,000 - 90,000 visas should be divided for different countries and categories?
1. Obtain a Schedule A retrogression amendment (anywhere from 15,000 - 90,000 visas) in the Spring.
2. Push for a permanent Schedule A retrogression amendment (Brownback amendment) whenever Congress considers Comprehensive Immigration Reform.
The concerns are
1. How to chose the numbers 15,000 - 90,000? We may need much larger numbers.
2. How the 15,000 - 90,000 visas should be divided for different countries and categories?
gc_dreamer_2010
01-27 05:36 PM
I tweeted to the ones that had twitter accounts. I will also give these guys a call and post letters.
@JudgeTedPoe Sir.Please vote 4 HR 43 to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act in helping Employment based advanced degree immigrants
4 minutes ago Favorite Reply Delete
@louiegohmert Sir.Please vote 4 HR 43 to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act in helping Employment based advanced degree immigrants
5 minutes ago
@SteveKingIA Sir.Please vote 4 HR 43 to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act in helping Employment based advanced degree immigrants
6 minutes ago
@eltongallegly24 Sir.Please vote 4 HR 43 to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act in helping Employment based advanced degree immigrants
@JudgeTedPoe Sir.Please vote 4 HR 43 to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act in helping Employment based advanced degree immigrants
4 minutes ago Favorite Reply Delete
@louiegohmert Sir.Please vote 4 HR 43 to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act in helping Employment based advanced degree immigrants
5 minutes ago
@SteveKingIA Sir.Please vote 4 HR 43 to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act in helping Employment based advanced degree immigrants
6 minutes ago
@eltongallegly24 Sir.Please vote 4 HR 43 to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act in helping Employment based advanced degree immigrants
more...
jamesbond007
11-13 01:59 PM
^^
Pappu,
I am assuming that you are looking for someone who was "layed" off; not necessarily just the end of their contract??
May be you ought to expand the criteria to also include anyone who has changed their full time job will-fully?
Pappu,
I am assuming that you are looking for someone who was "layed" off; not necessarily just the end of their contract??
May be you ought to expand the criteria to also include anyone who has changed their full time job will-fully?
2010 letting go of the past
abd
05-24 01:07 PM
Jsut sent the fax. Thanks for your hardwork. We need to have to ammendment in bill.
more...
dressking
09-21 06:21 AM
I did not feel like signing along for two reasons: we are not US citizen yet, and I consider myself citizen of the world and will always be. I do not aspire to become citizen of the United States of America.
Even when Americans sang their national anthem in a church, I felt not right. Churches are not supposed to be linked to states. There should be no country boundary within the Christian world.
There should be no country boundary within the world we want to build either.
By the way, if the United States go to war with your country of birth, who will you side with? Will the United States trust you?
Even when Americans sang their national anthem in a church, I felt not right. Churches are not supposed to be linked to states. There should be no country boundary within the Christian world.
There should be no country boundary within the world we want to build either.
By the way, if the United States go to war with your country of birth, who will you side with? Will the United States trust you?
hair letting go. quotes
javadeveloper
03-09 07:13 PM
as per http://www.indianembassy.org/newsite/NEW%20PASSPORT.asp#1
The following documents and fee are required to be submitted with the application:
� After having filled the application online, print a copy.
� Affix photograph as per specification in the box (do not staple photograph)
� Old Passport (in original)
� Additional booklet, if any, (in original)
� Three recent passport size photographs (3.5 cm x 3.5 cm -front facial pose). Photograph should have only a white background. (Photograph with coloured or dark glasses or in uniform or in Polaroid prints or Computer prints will not be accepted). One photograph to be pasted on the space provided on the first page of the application form
� Two proofs of residential address of the applicant, which may include current Driving License, Utility Bill, rent lease agreement showing the residential address.
Photocopy of the first five and last two pages of the original / old passport;
� Pages of passport showing US visa or Green Card (in original) Employment Authorization Card (in original) or other visa documents must be shown at the counter. A photocopy of the entire document / Card should be appended with the application (in case the application is sent by mail, a notarized copy of these documents should be sent);
� In case application for Green Card or EAC or visa is pending/being processed, a copy of documents in support of this fact must be submitted;
� In case the current passport does not contain the name of the spouse and the applicant wishes to have it entered in the new passport, copy of notarized marriage certificate must be submitted along with the application.
I am confused with few things in the above list of reqd documents:
1.It says white background , But I am only able get Cream colored background photos in CVS or Walgreen's
2.When I went notary in Bank Of America , the lady at bank says that she can't do notary for any copy of the document , she says she can do notary for a Application form that is signed in front of her.Same with marriage certificate.
I am confused and I need to travel by the end of this month.I need to drive 10 hrs 1-way to go to the consulate personally.
The following documents and fee are required to be submitted with the application:
� After having filled the application online, print a copy.
� Affix photograph as per specification in the box (do not staple photograph)
� Old Passport (in original)
� Additional booklet, if any, (in original)
� Three recent passport size photographs (3.5 cm x 3.5 cm -front facial pose). Photograph should have only a white background. (Photograph with coloured or dark glasses or in uniform or in Polaroid prints or Computer prints will not be accepted). One photograph to be pasted on the space provided on the first page of the application form
� Two proofs of residential address of the applicant, which may include current Driving License, Utility Bill, rent lease agreement showing the residential address.
Photocopy of the first five and last two pages of the original / old passport;
� Pages of passport showing US visa or Green Card (in original) Employment Authorization Card (in original) or other visa documents must be shown at the counter. A photocopy of the entire document / Card should be appended with the application (in case the application is sent by mail, a notarized copy of these documents should be sent);
� In case application for Green Card or EAC or visa is pending/being processed, a copy of documents in support of this fact must be submitted;
� In case the current passport does not contain the name of the spouse and the applicant wishes to have it entered in the new passport, copy of notarized marriage certificate must be submitted along with the application.
I am confused with few things in the above list of reqd documents:
1.It says white background , But I am only able get Cream colored background photos in CVS or Walgreen's
2.When I went notary in Bank Of America , the lady at bank says that she can't do notary for any copy of the document , she says she can do notary for a Application form that is signed in front of her.Same with marriage certificate.
I am confused and I need to travel by the end of this month.I need to drive 10 hrs 1-way to go to the consulate personally.
more...
camarasa
07-13 12:39 PM
Your heading seemed to indicate there is a secret news that you knew about in advance. If it is a speculation please add so in the header so that people don't get excited as soon as they see the header.
I agree
I agree
hot quotes about letting go and
Desy
10-07 02:39 PM
Hi Friends,
I am a permanent employee for "x" company, my 140 filed on May 1,2007 waiting for approval, 485 filed on August 22,2007 not been approved either, we just got our EAD's, also please note that i am on 6th year extension on h1... my company "x" moving all projects to the different company "y" from December 1, 2007. ie we are all moving to "y" with the same job title just everything is same istead of "x" it is now "y" company.
When i called my legal department and ask them about green card status they simply said nothing to worry... everything will be moved to "y" company, as a transition exployees..
Be honest with you guys...from the last 4 days... i could not sleep... i really dont know what to do in this situation, this is the reason.. i am seeking your help. can some one guide me or answer below questions please.
1. 140 filed 05/01/2007 - 11/30/2007 more than 180 days with "X" company
2. 485 filed 08/22/2007 - 11/30/2007 more than 90 days with "x" company
3. EAD approved
4. Travel documents approved
5. I am on H1 6th year extension.
6. Transition employee.
my question is
1 Can my green card status remains the same and continue the process with the new "y" company ?
2.Do "y" company has to start processing labour/140 again ??
3.Is it doable that moving everything from "x" to "y" including GC processings ??
Thanks in advance...Kindly help me out in this situation like how to proceed from here
With sincere regards...
Desy
I am a permanent employee for "x" company, my 140 filed on May 1,2007 waiting for approval, 485 filed on August 22,2007 not been approved either, we just got our EAD's, also please note that i am on 6th year extension on h1... my company "x" moving all projects to the different company "y" from December 1, 2007. ie we are all moving to "y" with the same job title just everything is same istead of "x" it is now "y" company.
When i called my legal department and ask them about green card status they simply said nothing to worry... everything will be moved to "y" company, as a transition exployees..
Be honest with you guys...from the last 4 days... i could not sleep... i really dont know what to do in this situation, this is the reason.. i am seeking your help. can some one guide me or answer below questions please.
1. 140 filed 05/01/2007 - 11/30/2007 more than 180 days with "X" company
2. 485 filed 08/22/2007 - 11/30/2007 more than 90 days with "x" company
3. EAD approved
4. Travel documents approved
5. I am on H1 6th year extension.
6. Transition employee.
my question is
1 Can my green card status remains the same and continue the process with the new "y" company ?
2.Do "y" company has to start processing labour/140 again ??
3.Is it doable that moving everything from "x" to "y" including GC processings ??
Thanks in advance...Kindly help me out in this situation like how to proceed from here
With sincere regards...
Desy
more...
house 5 Ways to Start Letting Go
msp1976
03-28 09:20 AM
Hi All,
Found this on murthy site as well as on shusterman website...is this going to add any extra mile to the things we already doing for a while?
-Madhu
All,
Please note,
We as non-immigrants cannot donate to immigrantList..
That organization has the goal of defeating the anti-immigration candidates in the next election. We non-citizens cannot donate to election campaigns...
Please contribute( or donate if you prefer) to IV ..
Found this on murthy site as well as on shusterman website...is this going to add any extra mile to the things we already doing for a while?
-Madhu
All,
Please note,
We as non-immigrants cannot donate to immigrantList..
That organization has the goal of defeating the anti-immigration candidates in the next election. We non-citizens cannot donate to election campaigns...
Please contribute( or donate if you prefer) to IV ..
tattoo Letting Go of the Past + Up From Depression (MP3)
techbuyer77
09-17 02:22 PM
I know how lucky I am and I thank God every day. Thanks!
more...
pictures let go of attachments,
gc28262
12-10 05:47 PM
Can we do something about this.
Maybe we can go to a federal court saying it is discriminatory and get a ruling to that effect. This would stop "any" state from coming up with such legislation.
Many states have such rules. We need to deal with at a national/federal level.
We have too many items to worry about. DL should not be one of those.
In this country one cannot work without a driver's license. It is a matter of human rights. When USCIS gives us work authorization that has only 4 months remaining on it, a state ( Texas ) cannot say that I am not eligible to drive in this 4 months.
There is some disconnect here.
Isn't it something similar that happened when Gandhiji was thrown out of a train is South Africa. Gandhi was discriminated based on his color. We are being discriminated on immigration status for our right to work.
Maybe we can go to a federal court saying it is discriminatory and get a ruling to that effect. This would stop "any" state from coming up with such legislation.
Many states have such rules. We need to deal with at a national/federal level.
We have too many items to worry about. DL should not be one of those.
In this country one cannot work without a driver's license. It is a matter of human rights. When USCIS gives us work authorization that has only 4 months remaining on it, a state ( Texas ) cannot say that I am not eligible to drive in this 4 months.
There is some disconnect here.
Isn't it something similar that happened when Gandhiji was thrown out of a train is South Africa. Gandhi was discriminated based on his color. We are being discriminated on immigration status for our right to work.
dresses LETTING GO - BEGIN YOUR LIFE
Dj-Studios
05-21 10:23 PM
I used:
The little angel. It's in the brighter area. Gave the dark areas alittle bit more "texture" so I kept it.
I also used the clouds in there. That's why the wings look all gold and shiny.:)
The little angel. It's in the brighter area. Gave the dark areas alittle bit more "texture" so I kept it.
I also used the clouds in there. That's why the wings look all gold and shiny.:)
more...
makeup letting go of the past.
raysaikat
08-24 09:29 PM
I will provide all info. related to EB1 very soon. Who so ever is interested please send me your questions.......
Whatever information you feel comfortable sharing, e.g., your job title, your publications, citations, patents, books, TPCs, how many recommendation letters and who wrote them, etc. If you do not want to post information on a public forum, you may send me a private message (right click on the link to my name and click on "send private message").
Whatever information you feel comfortable sharing, e.g., your job title, your publications, citations, patents, books, TPCs, how many recommendation letters and who wrote them, etc. If you do not want to post information on a public forum, you may send me a private message (right click on the link to my name and click on "send private message").
girlfriend Letting go of the past means
d123
09-25 11:34 AM
My wife recieved AP which was approved on 30 Aug. They approved mine on Aug 31. I have not recieved AP yet. My attorney advised to wait for 30 days.
-D
-D
hairstyles Letting go is simply making a
pd_recapturing
08-28 08:14 AM
I am also in same situation. Two 140s (eb2 and 3) both have same PD. Have beed trying for interfile from last one year. I do not know if my case is eb2 or still in eb3. I enquired from Congressman and she told me that my case is assigned to a IO on 6th Aug so its in eb2. She is not listening to anything else after telling me this information. I have infopass on 2nd Sep. lets see ...
cygent
05-30 08:23 PM
More power to the IV admins for having to deal with these cretins on a regular basis. And some of them return with new ID's OMG!! Whats up with that??
e then tolerate members who are disrespectful to others and do not bother about this effort.
Let other IV members judge for themselves what is right and what is wrong.
e then tolerate members who are disrespectful to others and do not bother about this effort.
Let other IV members judge for themselves what is right and what is wrong.
gcnirvana
06-11 03:05 PM
I wanted to share with all you guys that last Friday I went to the local CBP office and got our I-94 extended till 2010 :)
phew...what a relief it is. The officer was very polite and accepted that it was the POE Officer's mistake and told me that he blew it up. He gave us a new I-94 and struck out the number and wrote the number that was in my old I-94. He also updated that info in the system.
Thanks for all your help.
phew...what a relief it is. The officer was very polite and accepted that it was the POE Officer's mistake and told me that he blew it up. He gave us a new I-94 and struck out the number and wrote the number that was in my old I-94. He also updated that info in the system.
Thanks for all your help.
0 comments:
Post a Comment